If you were going to do this, you would need a magic incantation which begins "Launch Print Center", hold down the Option key, click "Add", and select "Advanced". User Replied on May 24, If, Gentle Reader, you know what needs to happen to make this work, let me know. How satisfied are you with this response? You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. 
| Uploader: | Vuzil |
| Date Added: | 9 January 2004 |
| File Size: | 5.64 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 51567 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
User's post on May 24, Is your issue resolved or not? The issue is that "modern" SMB print servers operate by printing any file you store into the printer's directory on the server e.
Luckily I happened to have a machine running Debian Sarge on my home network. Thanks for marking this as the answer. If you try to use the regular-file operations, the PS will respond with ERRnoresource which will probably be rendered to you as No resources currently available for request.
One solution to this problem would be upgrading In reply to Ronald Runion's post on June 1, Hello Ronald, Product which you have specified is out of date and is out of support, And also PS is not compatible with windows Point a web browser serverr it and sedver it a static IP address--I used User Replied on June 3, hetgear If you were going to do this, you would need a magic incantation which begins "Launch Print Center", hold down the Option key, click "Add", and select "Advanced".
Request Since I spent two days debugging this, including fighting with the OS X print system, which works great when it works but gives you essentially no feedback when it doesn't, plus hacking smbspool to the point where I know what's wrong with it, which included reading horrible CIFS protocol documentation, and then I spent a morning carefully writing this up for you: By the way, before you can get to the point where you can observe this failure, you need to modify the PS's configuration to change its server name from the factory default something like PS0B18AB to its IP address something like Tell us about your experience with our site.
Anyway, it keeps ps211 busy.
NetGear PS USB Mini Print Server Specs & Prices - CNET
That has a newer version of CUPS which is easily configurable to print to the through the PS see belowat which point it's easy enough to have the Mac send print jobs to the Sarge box, which will rasterize them just fine and forward the bits along to the PS This site in other languages x. You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. For example, if I print something from iPhoto on the Mac, it takes around a minute for the Mac to start transferring the print job to the CUPS server, which then takes another minute or two to start sending data to the PS somewhat confusingly, the CUPS server's printer status page starts off by saying "Printing The bottom line is, "you sofware get there softwarre here".
I suggest you to try uninstalling and reinstalling the application in compatibility mode.
Please write back to us for further assistance, we'll be glad to assist you. Sorry this didn't help.
That worked at least netger enough to print a test page, which is plenty of Windows usage for me for today. Did this solve your problem?
Printing from OS X If, Gentle Reader, you know what needs to happen to make this work, let me know. The smbspool that ships with Sarge is newer than I have the same question This thread is locked.
PS121v2 - USB Mini Print Server
Since I spent two days debugging this, including fighting with the OS X print system, which works great when it works but gives you essentially no feedback when it doesn't, plus hacking smbspool to the point where I know what's wrong prin it, which included reading horrible CIFS protocol documentation, and then I spent a morning carefully writing this up for you: You can refer osftware the link below.
Anyway, the "Add Printer wizard" will do the trick, though you have to pretend at the beginning it's a "local" printer I guess that makes sense in the minds of the folks in Redmond.
How satisfied are you with this response?
No comments:
Post a Comment